|
Page 1 of 3
In the 1940s and 50s, during Hollywoods golden age of film noir, darkness ruled the silver screen. Actors faces were often masked in shadow with highlights placed precisely for maximum dramatic effect. Los Angeles photographer Patrick Hoelck puts a modern twist on this classic approach, photographing todays biggest stars in his own unique world of shadow and light.
Like a Hollywood classic, Hoelcks portraits reveal a masterful understanding of studio lighting and an attention to detail that no technology can replace. He doesnt believe in the computer as a tool to cover up sloppy workmanship, preferring instead to let an obsessive personality push him to precision in lighting and perfection in the camera. In fact, only recently has Hoelck begun using the computer at all.
Out of all of my work, he says, Ive probably only shot two or three jobs fully digitally. Ironically, I just came back from my best digital experience. We did all the ads for Battlestar Galacticas new season; it was all digital, and it was the best digital job Ive ever done. I finally think I had a technician who understood me. In the past, I hadnt, and I never really dug it because of that. Theyd say, Yeah, yeah. We can get your look in two seconds, and Id get to set and it was just like Youre in outer space!
Hoelck typically shoots 4x5 and 6x7 filmKodak Portra 400. In the last three years, he has begun to scan his negatives for retouching, but that decision was purely business-driven; celebrities want their photographers to fully harness the power of Photoshop.
We dont change the value of light, Hoelck explains. Its more retouching in the sense that were working with entertainers and doing whats needed to make them look a certain way. When I didnt do it, I missed out on some jobs that I used to get, and I was always curious because I thought I was doing good work. I wasnt getting some actresses and I wasnt getting some bigger entertainers until I realized that it was because they wanted more digital retouching options. So I embraced it and I love it, but I dont really rely on retouching because I never had it before. My experience was to bring it in on film in an obsessive-compulsive manner because that was the way it would hit press. If I didnt get it in-camera, I couldnt rely on anyone to alter it, and I still think that way when Im shooting.
We do tweaks for sure, Hoelck continues, but I dont believe in being a computer artist or leaning on it that hard. I feel like I work hard to get the look in-camera and not just randomly shoot. Im very particular on set with light and look. I dont like to leave things hanging to be digitally fixed later. I think thats kind of hack work. I never wanted to be that. I work very closely with a great retoucher at DigitalFusion, Joe Puleio.
|