When asked if she had problems with the police herself, Kim admits, "I got pushed down by police. I think I'm thankful that I wasn't arrested because there were a lot of photographers and journalists who were." She quickly follows this up by saying that she wished she had been even more aggressive in her coverage. She would watch and follow the "NYPD top brass" as they moved to surveillance of many of the most active groups, which she would, in turn, document, as these were clearly the protestors of most interest to the authorities.
"I have a nose for news," says Kim. "Having been in the industry and having a newspaper background for 12 years, I know a good story when I see it," she laughs. "So when this Occupy thing happened, I came across it by accident, and it's right in my backyard in New York City, a 20-minute subway ride. So how can you not cover it? It's part of New York history, really."
Continues Kim, "There are photographers who focus on their work only, and there are those who want to educate others. I'm the latter. I use social media to educate and share what I know of 30 years. Also, I'm a big believer in capturing a moment as it unfolds. Position yourself to be there to document when shit is going down. This was my approach and focus with the protest. I wasn't interested in static 'holding signs' images, but rather I wanted to focus on the energy within these protests."
Alongside teaching, Kim is working to update her considerable archive of film photography for the digital age. After finding that several unlicensed images had gone viral on websites across the globe, she has also been working to educate younger photographers on the inherent dangers of exchanging intellectual property rights in exchange for Internet traffic. She sees that most content creators, from musicians to writers to photographers, are fighting the same fight, to salvage their intellectual property rights while still being able to promote their work.
"There has to be paid content on the Internet," she says. "That's for journalism, that's for TV, that's for anybody who creates original content. We have this trend where everything is free, everybody is getting a free ride, and I think the biggest mistake that newspapers made years ago was putting content online for free in lieu of traffic, and that's the pitch that Google and these Internet companies always advocate—you're getting exposure. And that's where we're at, and meanwhile, no one is making enough money. I look at it as, 'No one in this industry survives if they give away their content for free.'"